黄金科学技术
img

QQ群聊

img

官方微信

高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

黄金科学技术 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 761-770.doi: 10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2020.05.063

• 采选技术与矿山管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

高管任职年限对中国民营矿业企业经营效率的影响研究

郑明贵1,2(),吴萍1()   

  1. 1.江西理工大学矿业贸易与投资研究中心，江西 赣州 341000
    2.中国科学技术大学管理学院，安徽 合肥 230026
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-24 修回日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-10-31 发布日期:2020-11-05
  • 通讯作者: 吴萍 E-mail:mgz268@sina.com;jxlg213008@163.com
  • 作者简介:郑明贵（1978-），男，安徽颍上人，教授，博士生导师，从事资源经济与管理方面的研究工作。mgz268@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国战略性矿产资源国家安全评估与预警系统研究（2020-2050）”(18AGL002);国家自然科学基金重点项目“大数据环境下的评价理论、方法和应用”(71631006);江西理工大学重大项目培育计划“大数据驱动下国家矿产资源安全战略管理现代化研究”(19ZDPY-08);江西省青年井冈学者奖励计划联合资助

Research on the Impact of Senior Executives’ Tenure on the Operating Efficiency of Private Mining Enterprises in China

Minggui ZHENG1,2(),Ping WU1()   

  1. 1.Research Center of Mining Trade and Investment，Jiangxi University of Science and Technology，Ganzhou 341000，Jiangxi，China
    2.School of Management，University of Science and Technology of China，Hefei 230026，Anhui，China
  • Received:2020-03-24 Revised:2020-04-13 Online:2020-10-31 Published:2020-11-05
  • Contact: Ping WU E-mail:mgz268@sina.com;jxlg213008@163.com

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

528

摘要：

以中国沪深A股上市民营矿业企业财务数据为样本，运用超效率BCC模型测算得到2013~2018年中国民营矿业企业的经营效率，在此基础上对高管任职年限与中国民营矿业企业经营效率的关系进行了实证分析，并考察了高管任职经历丰富度和股权集中度对高管任职年限与民营矿业企业经营效率间关系所起的调节作用。结果表明：研究期内中国民营矿业企业经营效率普遍不高，仍存在较大提升空间；高管任职年限与中国民营矿业企业经营效率显著负相关；高管任职经历丰富度、股权集中度对高管任职年限与中国民营矿业企业经营效率的负向关系具有显著削弱作用。

关键词: 高管任职年限, 民营矿业企业, 经营效率, 超效率BCC模型, 高管任职经历丰富度, 股权集中度

Abstract:

The senior executives’ tenure is often regarded as a reflection of their power，cognition，experience，innovation and change attitude，which plays an important role in the management of senior executives and profoundly affects the operating efficiency of an enterprise.Most of the existing studies believe that there is a positive correlation between the two，but few studies examine the impact of current senior executives’ tenure on corporate operating efficiency from the perspective of China’s private mining enterprises，combined with the status of enterprises’ executive selection and operating management.Taking the financial data of 52 private mining enterprises listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen A shares as a sample，this paper measured the operating efficiency of them from 2013 to 2018 by using super-efficiency BCC model，and then maked an empirical analysis of the relationship between senior executives’ tenure and the operating efficiency of China’s private mining enterprises，also examines the moderating effect of senior executives’ post experience richness and equity concentration on the relationship.Based on the input-output perspective，this paper firstly selected total operating cost，net fixed assets，and employee compensation as input variables，total operating income and net profit as output variables，and used the super-efficiency BCC model to measure the operating efficiency of China’s private mining enterprises.The results show that：On the whole，the operating efficiency of China’s private mining enterprises is generally not high during the period of 2013 to 2018，with an average value of 0.682；The change trend of overall operating efficiency of enterprises shows a U-shaped distribution that first decreases and then increases.Specifically，the average number of enterprises whose operating efficiency needs to be improved urgently （that is，the value of operating efficiency is less than or equal to 0.6） is about 21 per year，accounting for 40.38% of the total sample size，while the average number of DEA efficient enterprises is about 3 per year，accounting for 5.77% of the total sample size.When discussing the impact of senior executives’ tenure on the operating efficiency of China’s private mining enterprises，an empirical analysis model of the relationship between senior executives’ tenure and the operating efficiency of China’s private mining companies，as well as a moderating effect model of senior executives’ post experience richness and equity concentration on the relationship between the two is constructed by taking corporate operating efficiency as dependent variable，senior executives’ tenure as independent variable，senior executives’ post experience richness and equity concentration as moderating variables，enterprise scale，enterprise listing age，asset-liability ratio，and heterogeneity of senior executives’ tenure as control variables.The results show that：（1）The senior executives’ tenure has a significant negative impact on the operating efficiency of China’s private mining enterprises；（2）The senior executives’ post experience richness and the equity concentration have a significant weakening effect on the negative relationship between senior executives’ tenure and the operating efficiency of China’s private mining enterprises.According to the empirical conclusions，this paper puts forward specific suggestions that are conducive to improving the management and operating efficiency of private mining enterprises.

Key words: senior executives’ tenure, private mining enterprises, operating efficiency, super-efficiency BCC model, senior executives’ post experience richness, equity concentration

中图分类号: 

  • F272

表1

投入产出变量的统计描述"

变量名称最大值最小值均值标准差
营业总成本39 871.6506.8445 435.4996 578.000
职工薪酬2 572.3671.523291.123394.410
固定资产净额27 272.9207.7053 086.6305 769.935
营业总收入43 646.79010.8625 773.2866 961.491
净利润5 150.042-2 672.407311.175714.076

表2

2013～2018年各效率值范围内中国民营矿业上市企业分布状况"

效率值范围各效率值范围内企业数量/家
2013年2014年2015年2016年2017年2018年
TE<0.6162231261715
0.6≤TE<0.71185766
0.7≤TE<0.81378958
0.8≤TE<0.989351210
0.9≤TE<1.0153584
TE≥1.0312049

图1

2013~2018年中国民营矿业上市企业整体经营效率变动趋势"

表3

变量描述性统计结果"

变量单位均值标准差最小值最大值
TE-0.6820.2770.1871.874
ATEN年3.5931.4891.0008.200
ANC家3.4211.3291.0007.400
TOP1%33.42113.4327.45077.290
SIZE亿元3.9341.2020.5036.889
AGE年11.7596.5371.00023.000
LEV%44.37620.7315.86090.030
HTEN-0.4530.2190.0000.760

表4

FGLS回归分析结果"

变量估计系数
模型(2)模型(3)模型(4)
SIZE

0.0140*

(1.90)

0.0108

(1.34)

0.0109

(1.53)

AGE

0.0099***

(6.21)

0.0089***

(5.50)

0.0107***

(6.34)

LEV

-0.0004

(-1.23)

-0.0003

(-1.00)

-0.0006*

(-1.88)

HTEN

-0.0042

(-0.16)

0.0236

(1.00)

-0.0029

(-0.12)

ATEN

-0.0177***

(-4.78)

-0.0225***

(-6.10)

-0.0180***

(-4.88)

ANC

-0.0111**

(-2.15)

ANC×ATEN

0.0084***

(3.24)

TOP1

0.0010

(1.37)

TOP1×ATEN

-0.0005**

(-2.05)

cons

0.5971***

(17.80)

0.6592***

(17.31)

0.5764***

(13.48)

Wald chi278.84***103.04***86.23***

表5

改变高管任职年限测算方法的稳健性检验结果"

变量估计系数
模型(2)模型(3)模型(4)
SIZE

0.0111

(1.39)

0.0108

(1.23)

0.0095

(1.24)

AGE

0.0108***

(6.65)

0.0087***

(5.07)

0.0118***

(6.64)

LEV

-0.0002

(-0.58)

-0.0004

(-1.20)

-0.0004

(-1.36)

HTEN

-0.0095

(-0.36)

0.0057

(0.23)

-0.0141

(-0.57)

ATEN

-0.0217***

(-4.00)

-0.0232***

(-4.51)

-0.0234***

(-4.37)

ANC

-0.0127**

(-2.18)

ANC×ATEN

0.0061**

(2.09)

TOP1

0.0007

(1.04)

TOP1×ATEN

-0.0005**

(-2.24)

cons

0.5851***

(18.01)

0.6669***

(15.45)

0.5719***

(13.11)

Wald chi2114.07***76.26***133.48***

表6

高管任职经历丰富度、股权集中度的调节作用分组检验结果"

变量高管任职经历丰富度股权集中度
低高低高
SIZE

-0.0007

(-0.12)

0.00226

(1.36)

-0.0307***

(-3.27)

0.0371***

(3.33)

AGE

0.0197***

(28.84)

-0.0024

(-1.03)

0.0069***

(2.86)

0.0088***

(3.12)

LEV

0.0006

(1.62)

-0.0008*

(-1.93)

0.0002

(0.61)

-0.0017***

(-3.54)

HTEN

-0.0934***

(-3.52)

0.0980**

(2.56)

0.1727***

(4.91)

-0.0815***

(-3.49)

ATEN

-0.0233***

(-6.55)

-0.0089*

(-1.71)

-0.0275***

(-6.04)

-0.0091*

(-1.77)

cons

0.5690***

(38.21)

0.6641***

(10.89)

0.7158***

(11.96)

0.5870***

(11.89)

Wald chi21112.38***20.55***98.89***146.81***
1 银开州.我国采掘业企业新一轮管理改进与改革研究［J］.黄金科学技术，2017，25（4）：65-72.
Yin Kaizhou.Study on the new round of management improvement and reform of Chinese mining enterprises［J］.Gold Science and Technology，2017，25（4）：65-72.
2 顾露露，蔡良，雷悦.家族治理、所有权变更与企业创新——基于中国家族企业的实证研究［J］.管理科学，2017，30（2）：39-53.
Gu Lulu，Cai Liang，Lei Yue.Family governance，alteration of ownership and firm innovation：Empirical study based on Chinese family-owned firms［J］.Journal of Management Science，2017，30（2）：39-53.
3 Allen M P.Managerial power and tenure in the large corporation［J］.Social Forces，1981，60（2）：482-494.
4 刘运国，刘雯.我国上市公司的高管任期与R&D支出［J］.管理世界，2007（1）：128-136.
Liu Yunguo，Liu Wen. Executive tenure and R&D ex-penditure of listed companies in China［J］.Management World，2007（1）：128-136.
5 Richard O C，Wu P，Chadwick K.The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance：The role of CEO position tenure and industry tenure［J］.The International Journal of Human Resource Management，2009，20（5）：1078-1095.
6 刘智强，葛靓，王凤娟.组织任期与员工创新：基于地位属性和文化差异的元分析［J］.南开管理评论，2015，18（6）：4-15.
Liu Zhiqiang，Ge Liang，Wang Fengjuan.Organizational tenure and innovative behavior：A meta-analysis based on status attributes and culture differences［J］.Nankai Business Review，2015，18（6）：4-15.
7 张涛，袁翠娟.上市公司经理人自利动机对经营绩效的影响研究［J］.经济与管理评论，2015（5）：81-86.
Zhang Tao，Yuan Cuijuan.A study of the impact of listed companies managers，self-interest motivation on operating performance［J］.Review of Economy and Management，2015（5）：81-86.
8 李卫宁，吴荻.基于TMT年龄和任期异质性调节效应的新任CEO显性特征与经营绩效关系研究［J］.管理学报，2014，11（8）：1158-1167.
Li Weining，Wu Di.Study on the relationship between demographic characteristics of new CEO and improvement of corporate performance：TMT heterogeneity moderation effect［J］.Chinese Journal of Management，2014，11（8）：1158-1167.
9 李金早，许晓明.CEO任期与企业绩效的关系机理探讨［J］.软科学，2008，22（12）：60-66.
Li Jinzao，Xu Xiaoming.Research on the intervening me-chanism between CEO tenure and corporate performance［J］.Soft Science，2008，22（12）：60-66.
10 孙轶，武亚军.战略规划、高管任职经验与企业绩效：基于中国转型经济的研究［J］.经济科学，2009（4）：104-117.
Sun Yi，Wu Yajun.Strategic planning，executive experien-ce and corporate performance：A study based on China’s transition economy［J］.Economic Science，2009（4）：104-117.
11 欧阳辰星，游达明.基于DEA-Panel Data模型的高管异质特征对创新效率的影响研究［J］.湖南科技大学学报（社会科学版），2017，20（4）：123-129.
Ouyang Chenxing，You Daming.Research on the relationship between the executives’ heterogeneous characteristics and innovation efficiency base on the DEA-Panel data model［J］.Journal of Hunan University of Science & Te-chnology（Social Science Edition），2017，20（4）：123-129.
12 王永进.关系与民营企业的出口行为：基于声誉机制的分析［J］.世界经济，2012（2）：98-119.
Wang Yongjin.Relationship and export behavior of private enterprises：An analysis based on reputation mechanism［J］.The Journal of World Economy，2012（2）：98-119.
13 左晶晶，唐跃军.CEO激励与国际化战略［J］.管理评论，2014，26（7）：148-158.
Zuo Jingjing，Tang Yuejun.CEO incentive and internationalization strategy［J］.Management Review，2014，26（7）：148-158.
14 吴良海，张媛媛，章铁生.高管任期、R&D支出与企业投资效率——来自中国A股资本市场的经验证据［J］.南京审计大学学报，2015（5）：56-68，94.
Wu Lianghai，Zhang Yuanyuan，Zhang Tiesheng.Executive tenure，R&D expenditures and enterprise investment efficiency：Empirical evidence from China A-share capital market［J］.Journal of Nanjing Audit University，2015（5）：56-68，94.
15 邱茜，徐向艺.上市公司高管团队知识结构特征对技术创新的影响研究［J］.东岳论丛，2011，32（2）：159-163.
Qiu Qian，Xu Xiangyi.The influence of knowledge structure characteristics of senior management team on technological innovation of listed companies［J］.Dongyue Tribune，2011，32（2）：159-163.
16 孟祥展，张俊瑞，白雪莲.外聘CEO职业经历、任期与公司经营战略变革的关系［J］.管理评论，2018，30（8）：168-181.
Meng Xiangzhan，Zhang Junrui，Bai Xuelian.External CEO career variety，tenure and corporate strategy reform［J］.Management Review，2018，30（8）：168-181.
17 Ryan H E，Wang L L.CEO mobility and the CEO-firm ma-tch：Evidence from CEO employment history［EB/OL］.？ abstract_id=，2012-07-16.
18 黄越，杨乃定，张宸璐.高层管理团队异质性对企业绩效的影响研究——以股权集中度为调节变量［J］.管理评论，2011，23（11）：120-125，168.
Huang Yue，Yang Naiding，Zhang Chenlu.Influence of the top management team heterogeneity and the firm performance：To focus on ownership concentration［J］.Management Review，2011，23（11）：120-125，168.
19 程翠凤.高管激励、股权集中度与企业研发创新战略——基于制造业上市公司面板数据调节效应的实证［J］.华东经济管理，2018，32（11）：118-125.
Cheng Cuifeng.Executive incentive，ownership concentration and corporate R&D innovation strategy：Empirical evidence based on the moderating effect of panel data of listed manufacturing companies［J］.East China Economic Management，2018，32（11）：118-125.
20 La Porta R，Lopez-De-Silanes F，Shleifer A.Corporate ownership around the world［J］.The Journal of Finance，1999，54（2）：471-517.
21 陈骏.谁影响了上市公司高管薪酬激励——来自中国证券市场的经验证据［J］.山西财经大学学报，2010，32（9）：70-79.
Chen Jun.Factors influencing top-management incentives of listed companies：Empirical evidence from Chinese stock market［J］.Journal of Shanxi of Finance and Economics University，2010，32（9）：70-79.
22 Charnes A，Cooper W W，Rhodes E.Measuring the efficiency of decision making units［J］.European Journal of Operational Research，1978，2（6）：429-444.
23 孙海刚.钢铁上市公司的技术效率与企业绩效——基于我国钢铁产业竞争力的提升［J］.经济管理，2009，31（7）：65-72.
Sun Haigang.An empirical study of relations between te-chnical efficiency and performance of steel listed corporations—Based on advancement of steel industrial competitiveness in China［J］.Business and Management Journal，2009，31（7）：65-72.
24 韩磊，苑春荟.中国电信业省际运营效率评价与影响因素研究——基于四阶段DEA方法的实证分析［J］.产业经济研究，2012（3）：26-32.
Han Lei，Yuan Chunhui.The evaluation of the operational efficiency and research on influencing factors of China’s telecom industry—An empirical analysis based on four-stage DEA［J］.Industrial Economics Research，2012（3）：26-32.
25 Güner S.Investigating infrastructure，superstructure，operating and financial efficiency in the management of Turkish seaports using data envelopment analysis［J］.Tran-sport Policy，2015，40：36-48.
26 Andersen P，Petersen N C.A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis［J］.Management Science，1993，39（10）：1261-1264.
27 王洁，贡芷蕾，张继良.我国高技术产业创新效率测评——基于制造业行业的分析［J］.调研世界，2019（8）：42-48.
Wang Jie，Gong Zhilei，Zhang Jiliang.Evaluation of innovation efficiency of high-tech manufacturing in China：The analysis based on manufacturing［J］.The World of Survey and Research，2019（8）：42-48.
28 王健，张卓.金融支持对战略性新兴产业发展的影响——基于中国上市公司的实证分析［J］.财经理论与实践，2015（4）：62-67.
Wang Jian，Zhang Zhuo.The effect of financial support on the development of strategic emerging industries：An empirical analysis based on Chinese listed companies［J］.The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics，2015（4）：62-67.
29 佟爱琴，邵鑫，杜旦.高管特征与公司绩效相关性研究——基于国有与非国有控股上市公司的对比［J］.科学学与科学技术管理，2012，33（1）：166-172.
Tong Aiqin，Shao Xin，Du Dan.Research on the relationship between top manager characteristics and corporate performance：Based on comparison between state-owned and non-state-owned listed companies［J］.Science of Science and Management of Science and Technology，2012，33（1）：166-172.
30 吴建祖，关斌.高管团队特征对企业国际市场进入模式的影响研究——注意力的中介作用［J］.管理评论，2015，27（11）：118-131.
Wu Jianzu，Guan Bin.The effect of top management team characteristics on international market entry mode：The mediating role of attention［J］.Management Review，2015，27（11）：118-131.
31 崔小雨，陈春花，苏涛.高管团队异质性与组织绩效的关系研究：一项Meta分析的检验［J］.管理评论，2018，30（9）：152-163.
Cui Xiaoyu，Chen Chunhua，Su Tao.Study on the relationship between heterogeneity of senior management team and organizational performance：A meta-analysis［J］.Ma-nagement Review，2018，30（9）：152-163.
32 范振林.技术进步、效率与矿产资源耗竭［J］.中国人口·资源与环境，2018，28（7）：190-193.
Fan Zhenlin.Technological progress，efficiency and mineral resource depletion［J］.Chinese Journal of Population，Resources and Environment，2018，28（7）：190-193.
33 Miller D，Shamsie J.Learning across the life cycle：Experimentation and performance among the Hollywood studio heads［J］.Strategic Management Journal，2001，22（8），725-745.
34 董斌，陈録飞.领导团队特征与公司经营绩效的统计检验［J］.统计与决策，2014（24）：202-204.
Dong Bin，Chen Lufei.Statistical test of leadership team characteristics and company performance［J］.Statistics & Decision，2014（24）：202-204.
35 胡明霞，干胜道.管理层权力、内部控制与高管腐败［J］.中南财经政法大学学报，2015（3）：87-93.
Hu Mingxia，Gan Shengdao.Management power，internal control and executive corruption［J］.Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law，2015（3）：87-93.
[1] 郑明贵, 曾健林. 股权集中度与中国私营矿业公司治理效率[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2020, 28(3): 380-390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

©2018 黄金科学技术编辑部

电话：0931-8277791　

E-mail: hjkx@lzb.ac.cn 邮编：730000　

陇ICP备17001318号-1    甘公网安备 62010202000672号
访问总数:    当日访问:    当前在线: